Dear Team AIAPC....
We should appreciate your efforts towards the concerns and emotions of the Postmaster cadre. But the information received from DTE is not true and not at all consoling too.
As a AIAPS team we also moved with directorate we already had received a positive reply. So We are in anguish towards the results of PM Cadre and very exact reason for delaying the PM cadre expressed by the Directorate is very pathetic.
Query of common postmasters and team AIAPS are produced below. Kindly keep the same too while moving towards this issue.
Sections
|
Information gathered by AIAPC
|
Query of Common
Postmasters and Team AIAPS
|
ADG, Estt-1(PE1)
Subject:
Cadre Restructuring of PM Cadre
|
Our team visited here basically for Cadre Restructuring of
PM Cadre The ADG Est-1 was on leave. During the discussion held at this
section, it has come to the notice that the CR process of RMS & SBCO is
going on.
TeamAIAPC also informed that already an internal meeting
was held at the Directorate regarding CR of remaining cadres. In this meeting
it was resolved that as PM Cadre has not yet completed its minimum service
for 5 yrs required for CR, hence the CR for PM Cadre could not preformed at
this time. An extract of DOPT’s instruction in this regard is reproduced
below:
Cadre review is an important aspect of cadre
management. It ensures a healthy balance between the functional requirements
of an organisation and legitimate career aspirations of its officers. The
thrust of such an exercise is on scientific manpower projection and
recruitment planning in order to rationalise the cadre structure as also to
enhance efficiency, morale and effectiveness of the service/cadre. In terms
of the extant guidelines, ideal periodicity of cadre review is once
every five years.
However, we have been assured that after completion of RMS
& SBCO etc., the CR of PM Cadre will be considered in favourable manner.
We provided all of our logics while discussion, but we was advised by the
concerned section that all of our anomaly must be re-submitted in proper
manner with all grievances at the end of December-2016 or starting of January
-2017.
|
1. If so, PM cadre was introduced during December 2010 itself.
Already 5 years 9 months are gone. There is no question of completion of 5
years.
2. If so in the discussions of Cadre restructure of
official and staff side PM cadre proposal was also discussed and we already
had a bilateral agreement to consider the PM Cadre proposal on the light of
the same at par with Group-C.
3. If so Group-C norm based LSG posts would be placed with G.P Rs.4200 but the same norm based LSG posts - PM cadre offices shall be kept with G.P Rs.2800/-.
If so Then same work but different discriminated pay to Postmasters. Isnt it?
Why these conflicts?
|
So Dear team AIAPC....
You have mentioned that 3 years was wasted by childish manner. If so you are also doing the same running towards court cases instead of functioning under a recognised forum. Already two years wasted by you too. For the past one year single hearing was taken place in the jodhpur court case.
Above all why not even interim orders hon'ble court was not pressed by your team? Court itself had ordered to not to decide anything about Postmaster cadre until the final outcome of that jodhpur court case in the membership verification process 2015. That order is itself not pressed by the team AIAPC. What is the purpose of court trials are being conducted by you?
